The Yabloko Association believes that changes
needs to be made to the procedure for forming both the Federation
Council and the State Duma. On August 4, 2000, Deputy Head
of the Yabloko faction in the State Duma Sergei Ivanenko
told journalists that an inquiry to the Constitutional Court
has been drafted, which contains a request for more precise
interpretation of the articles of the Constitution, "to
be more precise, to explain what is understood by the term
"formation" of the Federation Council and whether
the direct election of members of the upper chamber is possible
within the context of said interpretation".
Ivanenko also noted that once 90 parliament
members have signed this
inquiry, it will be forwarded to the Constitutional Court
in September.
Ivanenko confirmed once again that "Yabloko advocates
direct elections to
the Federation Council". In addition, he also said
that a draft law had been
submitted to the State Duma, which envisages that 70% of
the deputies would
be elected to the Duma by party lists and 30% by single
mandate electoral
districts.
Ivanenko said: "We think that the State
Duma should only represent political
parties and movements, i.e. all deputies should be elected
by party lists."
He also thinks that the present mixed electoral system to
the Duma (50% of
the Duma are elected under a majority (first past the post)
system and 50%
according to proportional representation) is indicative
of "a transitional
system".
Ivanenko also said that he categorically
opposes proposals to completely
exclude election of deputies according to party lists. If
this happens, the
Duma will acquire a considerable number of deputies who
either depend on the
authorities or represent the black market criminal capital.
Asked whether the State Council should be
accorded constitutional status,
(as has been widely discussed) Sergei Ivanenko stressed
that this body "can
be only an advisory body and should not be granted any constitutional
status". Ivanenko noted that at present the country
enjoys a certain balance
of power and the redistribution of power proxies in favour
of some other new
body would not be rational.
Ivanenko added: "We should develop
further what we have, specify the
competence of the present structures, create a system of
constraings and
counterbalances and only make changes to the Constitution
in our pursuit of
this goal." He also noted that making changes to the
Constitution was "a
very complicated procedure and experience tends to indicate
that changes to
the Basic Law can only be made, if there is a very high
level of social
consensust". In any case, stressed Ivanenko, this is
a protracted process
and such changes cannot be made quickly.
Based on Interfax reports.
See also:
Vladimir Lukin does
not think that the State Council should be provided with
constitutional functions
|